We’ve published several election themed posts lately – about how the candidates should have campaigned digitally, about broadband, we’ve even published a designers guide to the election. Overkill? Not for a second – here’s another one.

This time, the focus will be a bit less specifically digital. if there’s a big story to emerge from this election, it’s the speed with which the ALP was able to turnaround the mountain of goodwill they generated by ousting of John Howard, saying Sorry to the Stolen Generations and steering Australia through the global financial crisis remarkably unscathed. Even the potentially disasterous sacking of Kevin Rudd as party leader was offset by a wave of goodwill for Julia Gillard. How did they turn this into a disaster?

The reality  is that there are hundreds of reasons reasons, and they’ll be debated  for a long time, in forums more relevant than this one. This is not the place for policy. It is the place, however, to look at campaigns and brand  Brand was a huge factor in this campaign and  it really stuck out for me the way the ALP, particularly the Prime Minister, stuck to their message so closely. They hammered the same lines over and over again, and eventually it was to their detriment. In fact, they stuck to their message so closely they trashed their brand. (more…)

Posted by
Chris Lachowicz @ 3:54 pm |

As a Digital Producer one of the most common questions I’m asked (after explaining  that no, I don’t make movies) is “what’s the deal with Twitter?”  Clients  in particular will acknowledge Twitter’s importance as a tool for their organisation, but express a slight bewilderment at how or why it is useful to them on a personal level.  Someone recently said  “I can see why WE need to be using it, but why should I be using it?”pretty much summing the conundrum up. Almost as common are people who flirt with it for a few weeks, then lose interest. The most common reason?  “Oh, I started using it, but couldn’t think of anything to say so I stopped.

In Australia,  the stats back up the anecdotes. There are currently around 277,000 users, or roughly 1.5 % of the population. In the US, the following is far greater(a detailed breakdown of the numbers, with an incorrect headline, here), but still nothing like the level that Facebook’s are or MySpace’s were. The uptake experience of people I’ve talked to mirrors the stats as well. An estimate 40% of users drop off in the first month.

For professionals and businesses, there’s not really much debate anymore about Twitter’s worth. It has proven itself  an outstanding means by which to build a brand,  for business to business communication, and to speak directly to those interested in your band. If you’re already a celebrity, all the better – the opportunity for to connect with fans and to build your fame by giving them a taste of your fabulous celebrity lifestyle, at no cost to yourself, is just outstanding.  If you’re a tech person, or a media professional, or work in an agency, again, the benefits and uses are obvious and immediate.

But what about the average person, you ask? How do they make Twitter more than just “that website with the bird”? Pretty easily. Here are igloo’s tips on making Twitter work for you:

1. Don’t assume you have to say anything.

As  I mentioned, people often express their reservations about Twitter by asking “But what would I write about?”. The answer I usually give is don’t write anything.  (more…)

Posted by
Chris Lachowicz @ 4:36 pm |

In my post last week, I mentioned a report which blamed the lack of spending on internet advertising in part on the low quality of online advertising campaigns. It’s a claim that you hear from time to time working in the field,  either in the form of stray”I hate those pop up things” comments,  or from serious sources like this 2009 article from TechCrunch, which claims that “the internet is about freedom… and a truly free population will not be forced to watch ads”

The comment stayed with me through the week. I knew it was wrong and could thing of a lot of reasons, but didn’t post about it as I couldn’t think of a succinct way to explain it. Then the Old Spice Man exploded, and it dawned on me. It’s wrong because people LOVE internet advertising.

If you’ve been in a sleeping pill induced coma for the past week, the Old Spice Man is a deodorant campaign which has exploded. It’s mildly amusing bit in the Chuck Norris/ Barry “The Cougar” Dawson vein (you could almost call the humour Anchorman-lite)  which has exploded across the internet. It has 55 million YouTube views, and the campaign’s been given legs with the having the character uploading personal responses to users from various social media sources, answering questions on Yahoo, and so on.

The campaign’s not a great one, but it shows just how deeply internet advertising can penetrate if it is popular – or more correctly, how deeply a popular campaign can disseminate with proper integration and some momentum. This is advertiser created content as a legitimate entertainment source – people are engaging because they like the campaign in and of itself, not the product. Advertisements – not advertiser funded content, advertisements – are now a legitimate form of entertainment. (more…)

Posted by
Chris Lachowicz @ 11:03 am |

Why did I buy BP?

July 7, 2010

I did something I am utterly ashamed of the other day.

I went and filled up the car with a full tank of petrol from my local BP servo. What got me was that I did it without even thinking about what has been going on in the Gulf of Mexico. Yep, despite my constant rants about the environment, riding bikes, better ways to live and so on, it did not even register in my head what I had done until a couple of days later.

This got me thinking. I stopped eating Kit Kat after Greenpeace ran a fantastic campaign to highlight the plight of the Orangutan.  I black banned De Beers diamonds after reading Blood Diamond. Geez I event went off Gordon Ramsey after he came out to Australia and made a complete twat of himself. But, to my surprise, I am yet to see much more than a token response to what BP has caused in the Gulf of Mexico. To my knowledge, no local revolt against buying BP, no compelling social media action. Just, it seems, a token response in facebook, twitter, some isolated protests.

Why?

Is it because we all need petrol in some way, so we have to accept that these things will happen? Or because it happened in the Gulf of Mexico and not Bass Strait. Or are we just so battered by these things happening that we just don’t register any more? Maybe we are waiting for someone else to do it? Or, something else I have hear “Why black-ban BP when they are all bad?”

I don’t have the answer, but I do know this. Yes, I need petrol. Yes, these things happen. But unfortunately, on this occasion, it seems it was a) preventable and b) BP could have done and could be doing a lot more to fix the problem in terms of response time, cash and resources. I used to like the BP logo. At the time I thought it was a real swing by a company involved in a necessary evil to look “Beyond Petrol” Lets just say the brand looks a little darker to me now and I won’t be buying BP anytime soon.

@tonyprysten

More info

Gulf of Mexico official response by BP

BP Flickr Group for some nice company pics of the resonse

Posted by
Tony @ 12:22 pm |

Filed under:

Brand,Rant,The Planet

Amazing iPhone font

March 25, 2010

iphone font

If you have just a ‘bit’ too much time on your hands and are addicted to downloading those colourful iphone apps, what better way to express your creativity then creating an (almost) complete font made out of 540 different app icons. Very cool and we’ll even forgive the crazy designer for leaving out the ‘W’.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeDB0H5Lf5w&feature=player_embedded

Posted by
igloo @ 9:29 pm |

Good Vibrations

February 8, 2010

future2Word up “Opportunity doesn’t knock, it vibrates”. Is that the significant difference between traditional media v’s new media, conventional v’s innovative, same v’s different? If only it was that simple.

The truth is traditional media and new media are co-dependent. Like any marriage in its early blossoming stages, its all about compromise. Debate is part of the process and it’s not always smooth sailing and champagne breakfasts but when it does work it’s marital bliss.

With harmonious conversion and digital knowledge on the brain I recently attended the AIMIA & IAB 7th Future of Digital Advertising conference (more…)

Posted by
Teall @ 4:31 pm |

History of Flight

October 7, 2009

historyofflight

Nike websites never seem to fail. Check out the new microsite “History of Flight” paying homage to Michael Jordan’s career in basketball. We’ve seen plenty of flash pop-up books animation – but this is the best by far in terms of visual. We get to see the inspiration and concept behind each shoe. Clean, simple and engaging. If anyone has seen any cool pop-up book flash sites, share it with us!

Posted by
Charmaine @ 3:35 pm |

Filed under:

Brand,Digital,Interactive

Is it an apple?

October 6, 2009

applewollies

Well the lawyers at apple must be having a quiet week this week given Steve Jobs hasn’t ripped off any products lately. The next issue to keep the legal fraternity afloat – apple thinks wollies new logo is a trademark infringement on the apple logo. Like it or hate it (I happen to be a fan but it seems to have the design community divided) the new wollies logo could be interpreted as an apple (or ‘fresh produce’ as wollies claim) but saying its a rip-off of ye olde apple logo is, I think, a bit far fetched. Does this mean orange own the square (or the colour orange) Virgin own any logo with a ‘V’ in it or playboy own any logo with a girl. I don’t think so!

What do you think? Like the wollies logo? Hate it? Think apple have a case? Sorry, I mean Apple ®©™

Posted by
igloo @ 9:32 am |

Filed under:

Brand,Design,Rant

isnack

According to the Vegemite website, the inspiration behind the iSnack 2.0 name came from competition winner Dean Robbins two great loves in his life – ‘technology and Vegemite’. Given that Dean is a graphic and web designer I guess it’s lucky that he didn’t call it; ‘Adobe Creative Sweet 4‘ or ‘Mac OS X Snack Leopard’

Tom O’Donnell, from the Australian Institute of Sales Marketing and Management, has pointed out in the Herald Sun:

“… they couldn’t have bought the advertising space which the interest in this name has generated”.

It was either a very clever marketing ploy or or a “very stupid decision”.

What is beyond question though, is the unsavory taste the name has left in peoples mouths. Observing todays online chatter was like watching an unsuspecting tourist gag on their first mouthful of the original ‘Veg’. Luckily though, I have thought of a few other great products that could benefit from some nonsensical technical lexicon. Here are just a few fine examples -

  • Semantic Speedos
  • Holden Quicktime
  • Libra Mac Minis
  • Arnotts Macbook AirBiscuit

So what do you guys think? If you reckon you have a killer name up your sleeve, let us know. Best suggestion wins a ‘priceless’ igloo incubator book.

Posted by
igloo @ 11:34 pm |

Digital Dump 24/08/09

August 24, 2009

ny-premier

Now That’s What I Call Digital Advertising

I thought I’d start this week with a few examples where companies got their digital advertising right. When you’re exposed, like I am, to a lot of web campaigns, it’s easy to become a bit blase and not see the forest for the trees.  But these, for differing reasons, stood out.

First up, Toyota have partnered with EA and produced a virtual version of the Prius for Sims 3.  While this kind of integration has been happening in the movies for time immemorial, it’s less common in the world of video games. The Sims is the perfect starting point as, as well as being the most successful PC game ever, 50% of its audience is female, very unusual in a market dominated by young males. A simple, clever idea, hitting the Prius’s demographic right on the head.

Another thing we often work on are online competitions, and the mantra we repeat  when doing so is keep it simple, make it interesting, make it easy and make the prize memorable. The World’s Cutest Dog Competition ticks every box – simple, easy mechanic, everyone dog owner thinks theirs is the cutest, a million dollars worth of prizes. Tick, tick, tick – and the result is a huge number of entries and unbelievable exposure for the sponsor. And on a completely different tip, but great for the same reason, is  Canadian beer Okanagan Spring’s Sponsor Me Spring. Visitors to sponsormespring.ca could appeal, through video, to Okanagan Spring to sponsor their small-scale or backyard social gatherings. This saw the sponsor of events as salubrious as Hanging Around After Ed’s Soccer Game. It generated some some really funny content – definitely a site worth browsing for a while. The promotion obviously really speaks to the beer’s target market.

But if you’re not going to go with simple, make it memorable. Wrigley’s France have launched this fantastic augmented reality competition to promote 5gum, where you mix a track and create a visual, upload it. A few similar things have popped up lately, including one to promote Eminem’s “The Release”‘s UK launch, but I haven’t seen it done this well. The site around it is nicely done as well.

Four clever ideas, well executed – great stuff.

Privacy in the Public Space

A couple of privacy-related stories popped up this week. Firstly, once again, a lawsuit against Facebook for privacy breaches was dismissed as being groundless, and a report was released in the US that found 45% of employers screen potential employees via social media.  It still amazes me how people still have the “Invisible in my car” mentality when using social media. Even though cars you’re perfectly visible to the outside world  in their car, they behave as if they are in public – picking noses, singing, putting on make up. And it’s the same on with social media – as private as it feels, it’s not. Sites’ number one concern is UBs, not making sure no one sees that photo of you drunk at Schoolie’s Week in 2001.

Interestingly, the reality of lives being increasingly led in public are the subject of a new documentary We Live In Public, which won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance this year. The film, directed by Ondi Timoner (who also directed the cult classic Dig!) looks at the life and work of Josh Harris. Harris was a pioneer in the first dot com boom, launching pseudo.com, the first internet television network. He used his fortune on an event he called Quiet!We Live In Public. Part art installation and part social experiment, he gathered 100 artists in a Japanese pod hotel style building for 100 days, all of it on web cam.  Basically, he was commenting on how, as the internet made greater levels of connection possible, people would be increasingly willing to sacrifice, or rather redefine, their notions of privacy. It’s an observation which has proved to be very prescient.

What this probably all means is that we’re at the end of the anything goes era of social media. As a social media presence becomes an accepted part of everyone’s life, we’ll be forced to meet the same standards there as in the “real world”. Which also means there is potentially a commercial opportunity for someone who works out a way of keeping social media private, whether through paid subscriptions or comprehensive history kills.

Twitter in Pictures

Finally, a nice little infographic showing what the Twitter community would look like if it was 100 people – although I wonder what criteria they were using when they categorized other people’s tweets as “inane”, and how big the sample group was.

Older Posts »

  • @igloodigital
  • Categories
  • Archives